Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine E. Heald


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Catherine E. Heald

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO.  scope_creep Talk  00:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete most of the sources are either a passing mention, or include a quote by Heald with a one-sentence passing mention. The ones with more meat are not independent. I couldn't find further high-quality sourcing. Femke (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - This looks good and in-depth, but not enough if we can't find a few more like this. Caphadouk (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a PR website with a PR article.   scope_creep Talk  09:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree. She fails to do enough to pass WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 11:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.