Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Inculet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Davewild (talk) 07:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Catherine Inculet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be NN individual lacking not-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note I declined this as an WP:A7 speedy deletion because there was some assertion of notability.
 * Delete - Even though I declined the speedy, this article does not provide any WP:RS to substantiate any assertion of notability. Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 20:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agreed, multiple searches at News, Books, Scholar (precautionary in case of results), Highbeam and the freelibrary found nothing aside this (which must be her considering it says Canada). A passing browser search found an obituary but not helpful at all so there's not one significant source to improve the article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I see two results for "Catherine Inculet" in GBooks, Canada on Stage (two castlists) and Canadian Author & Bookman, and two more for "Inculet, Catherine", Canadian Theatre Review Yearbook (pp 308, 309) and The Canadian Law List. There may be more for initials, and because Google has problems with speech marks in search terms. James500 (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep -Catherine was afraid of the Internet and tried to be off it as much as possible, thus not very much is accredited to her. Just because you found nothing of note there, the fact that she was Chairman of two City of London committees and a founder of the London Arts Council and has one book of poetry published should make her Notable enough for Wikipedia. Have you seen some of the poet and author profiles on here, some are one or two sentences long or a short paragraph and have less notability. I have been working on here since 2007. I apologize if I didn't make the article less bias and in the third person neutral, I tried. Wouldn't it be nice if we helped each other out with positive suggestions as to editing and search for references and notability things instead of just deleting things because we never heard of someone? Keep. Haiku Tea (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree but unfortunately those sources are very important. SwisterTwister   talk  17:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * delete Memorial page for a woman obviously valued by her friends.  Because obituaries are a pretty good guide to notability, I searched the local papers, the London Free Press, London Community News, The Londoner.  Found none.  A chapbook while it is an accomplishment, is not an indication of notability since I could find no mentions of it in RS. WP:NOTMEMORIAL the haunting irony here is the name of her chapbook of poetry: She Left No Footprint.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.