Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Apostolic National Church in Great Britain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Catholic Apostolic National Church in Great Britain
This article changes names every couple months, is completely unverifiable, and talks about a non-notable church. In addition, it's a vandalmagnet (not exactly sure why), and the previous AfD keep consensus was keep but leave up for about a week to collect references. Wooty 16:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wholeheartedly agree. I'm tired of sweeping gibbon references from an article that makes no valid claims to notability and has no sources. What is to distinguish this church from about a billion other Catholic splinter groups? Hmm... maybe it would be a good idea to go through this whole related cluster of minor Catholic splinter movement articles and nom them for deletion. I think I'm going to get on that now. Captainktainer * Talk 16:50, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Denominations are generally notable. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:NN. NeoFreak 06:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment AFD etiquette calls for including lings to prior AfD discussions. Here is the old one: Articles for deletion/Catholic apostolic national church, where the result was "move to" the current title.  (Ie, not exactly as described by the nominator.)  GRBerry 01:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd just like to point out that when I was considering nominating for AfD, I also was unaware of the previous AfD, despite making a good-faith effort to find previous AfDs. Captainktainer * Talk 17:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You aren't the nominator... GRBerry 15:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm aware; Wooty beat me to it while I was still working on it. Captainktainer * Talk 13:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and NeoFreak. Prolog 12:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep It is really hard to tell on the evidence available, so I am unsure if this is a true denomination. It looks like it is.  This page suggests at least 10-12 local congregations in Great Britain, which would be a denomination, but I'm really not certain and would prefer better sources.   GRBerry 21:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.