Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Ashrams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Darkwind (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Catholic Ashrams

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A self published book by author owned publishing company, lacking third party RS coverage. Fails all the criteria of WP:BOOKCRIT. Only has passing mentions in a few non reliable sources. Reference used in the article are primary sources. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable self-published book.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm running into the same issue here that I did with the other book. It is discussed somewhat, but mostly in relation to something or someone else - in this case it's discussed more in relation to Goel's overall arguments and beliefs. I also want to note that it looks like the 1988 and the 1994/5 books had slightly different titles, as I'm finding evidence that the 94/5 (the date of publication seems to differ somewhat depending on the source) was titled "Catholic Ashrams: Sannyasins or Swindlers?". I'm thinking that the sourcing I'm finding could be used to establish notability for the author and include some info about this in his article, but I don't know if there's really enough out there to firmly establish notability for an independent article, at least what I'm seeing in English. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- If this were restructured so that it was an encyclopedic article on the subject of the book, rather than an article on a book, it might be worth having. However it is not the job of WP to review books.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BOOKCRIT. Lacks any sustained WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources, and was created by a WP:SPA. Newshunter12 (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , very good observation. The creator indeed seems to be a WP:SPA. There are a few more of them creating articles on this author. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.