Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Holocaust Complicity Views

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Joolz 16:51, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Catholic Holocaust Complicity Views
This is a stub created by User: Robert McClenon "to permit building of article" on 23 July 2005. Since then there have been no meaningful additions to the article. The information is already covered on various other pages. Str1977 22:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * While there might be merit in having the information on the subject on one page, this is not a suitable stub nor an NPOV title to build upon. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:18, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree with conclusion. Was originally created to try to deal with conflict, but appears not to be useful.  Delete Robert McClenon 23:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a classic example of how not to start an article. It lists one 'argument' in favor of complicity, and none against. Er, well, I guess that proves it, then.... TheMadBaron 10:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Kelete. The present text is atrocious, but a valuable article could be written here. — Phil Welch 23:40, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * We've been through a bunch of these conspiracy-theory articles on this topic before. The only argument presented is that the Catholic church didn't stop a political party from coming to power.  How would it do that?  Wouldn't it be a far greater cause of righteous indignation if a church did stop a political party from coming to power?  Assuming there's a surviving legitimate article existing on the topic, it would already contain the only source (Hitler's Pope) cited here, so no need to merge.  Delete.  Barno 23:55, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Information is already on other pages, so this article serves no real purpose now. Ann Heneghan (talk) 15:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.