Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Social Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Catholic Social Services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional with WP:COI. Nothing in WP:RS. Fails WP:NORG. Störm  (talk)  16:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The social services programme of a major denomination, even in a Muslim majority country should be reliable. If a source was a RS when the article was created or edited, it does not cease to be one because it has become a deadlink, perhaps due to having migrated to a new web-host.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * There is a single name-check at the end of this article from DAWN. Other sources like UCA are online Catholic website in Asia. Störm   (talk)  09:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You can see UCA website here. Störm   (talk)  09:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the sourcing is fine (UCA is a reliable source for the purposes of notability and verification), the issue is that it's actually coverage about the diocese and not the group: this appears to be a diocesan level charity, not a national one from what I can tell. I'd be happy to change my !vote if someone point out to me otherwise. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me down. I'll take care next time. Störm   (talk)  15:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep It is a well established organisation and covered in books which can be used to expand the article, see for instance    Mar4d  ( talk ) 01:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. local organization with no national significance. The references are either mentions, are incidental short  case studies within a general article DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.