Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catlin (surgery)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Catlin (surgery)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is even worse than a stub, a single useless sentance. Hopeless for those who want to do some serious research on the item. It contains no refrences to helpful websites whatsoever and neither does it boast a single picture. Basically I think this article is a waste of space, I've seen more informative topics deleted therefore and see no need for the existance of this.

Note: I know the catergory for this AfD seems odd (as Catlin is actually in a catergory), but it was the most sensible option I could take. A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 18:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - The article is going to be transwikied to Wiktionary. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  18:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * So I suspect that it will be deleted anyway? I wasn't too sure whether it would be in the process, hence half the reason why I nominated this.  A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 19:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Transwiki away. I added a source, but I agree that this is more of a dictionary topic than a Wikipedia article.  Besides it's too easy to confuse with Caitlin, and what little girl wants to be told that she was named after a surgical instrument used for the amputation of limbs?  Mandsford (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * God, transwiki - Not even close to meeting the inclusion guidelines. Gotta check up on older AFDs now. -- Lord   ₪   Sunday   21:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, if it's the Lord's will, your prayer will be answered. Mandsford (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article has been expanded and referenced. ~ Ningauble (talk) 00:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. per improvements since nom. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - New version of article is much improved. A catlin belongs in Wikipedia just as much as a catheter or a mandolin, two objects with lengthy entries.FellGleaming (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I change my mind. After seeing how much the article has grown, with a picture, references and a new In Fiction section, I now think it is worth keeping. All I guess we have to do now is to wait for an administrator to close this discussion -_-.  A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 16:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.