Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cato Hoeben (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Cato Hoeben
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Tagged recently by for lack of notability. 1st AfD attracted no comments; hopefully we can resolve it this time. Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now per being TOO SOON. It appears this person's end works have notability, but THIS composer does not have the media coverage to meet WP:BIO... yet.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Perhaps TOO SOON, but I'm certainly not seeing anything in the first 100 or so Google results for this very unique name that counts towards fulfillment of GNG. Carrite (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't appear to meet any notability criteria.  Kharkiv07 Talk  20:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.