Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cato Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Discussions about moving the article can occur on the article talk page.

The nominator, who has been active for just 2 weeks, is advised to acquire more editing experience and policy knowledge before nominating articles for AFD discussions. That's my opinion, not consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Cato Street

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV because it's singularly sourced to meet WP:NOTABILITY. I have notability concerns for this article; it must either be deleted or moved to a general article that lists this play. I've looked on the news, Google, books, and scholars but couldn't find anything. Normanhunter2 (talk) 00:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. The stub cites reviews in The Guardian and The Sunday Times, as well as the Theatricalia listing.  Here and Here are more mentions.  The V&A Museum even has a feature about the play and its costumes. This play was written well before the internet existed, so most of the sources would be print sources. The play had a starry cast led by Vanessa Redgrave.  I disagree with the nominator.  It clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. If we want to fill out the stub to its full potential, someone will have to go to the library and get all the 1971 sources. From what I can see, it has an interesting background: Olivier commissioned the play for the Old Vic, but funding was not sufficient, so it played at the Young Vic.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've got 1971 reviews from The Daily Telegraph and the Birmingham Post. Combined with the existing reviews, this demonstrates notability for the play. Toughpigs (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. If kept then it should be moved to Cato Street (play) and Cato Street redirected to Cato Street Conspiracy, the clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be fine. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - cites demonstrate notability; agree a disambiguate move would be helpful. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.