Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cats of Woodside, South Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete: this is an obvious hoax Nick-D (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Cats of Woodside, South Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N(E). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - as hoax. I looked up so many variations on this and found literally nothing. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  14:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as an obvious hoax. "As has been written in the history annals of Woodside, these three cats have fought for the ownership of the town, and have not taken any prisoners in their ascent to the throne"? Not on this planet... הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 23:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. If it were true it would fail on notability, but the incidental details are so clearly made up that it can only be a joke.--AJHingston (talk) 23:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.