Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cattai North, New South Wales

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete because it does not appear to exist. -- Joolz 01:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Cattai North, New South Wales
Was listed for speedy deletion but is not a speedy candidate. No vote from me. Angr/undefined 11:15, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - substub with very limited info, but info all the same which could potentially be of use. Also has the potential to be expanded. CLW 12:02, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Precedent is that suburbs should be listed under the city they are in. Delete Pilatus 12:13, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep provided such a municipality exists. &mdash; J I P | Talk 16:18, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep All real settlements. CalJW 19:06, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep towns such as D'Lo, Mississippi have articles here for God's sake (even though I don;t think that is notable either).Molotov (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]] 20:40, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the stub. Perhaps it is borderline, but it looks like the members of Wikiproject Sydney are motivated and intent on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Sydney and its environs. Good on ya, mates! --DavidConrad 21:36, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, because this suburb does not appear to exist:
 * There is a state government body that defines suburbs called the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales. You can search their database, and I encourage you to do exactly that, because it will reveal there is no suburb called "Cattai North" or "North Cattai".
 * There is a federal government body called Geoscience Australia, which is "the national agency for geoscience research and geospatial information", and it has a database on place names of Australia, which you can search here, and I encourage you to do exactly that, because it will reveal there is no suburb called "Cattai North" or "North Cattai".
 * Street Directory: The definitive Sydney street directory is called the UBD, and it contains a comprehensive list of "Suburbs and Localities". This list does not contain any entry for "Cattai North" or "North Cattai".
 * When I asked the person who added these suburbs about this, they indicated there was "a bit of gunk" in the data they were using.
 * This suburb is not shown in the map Baulkham Hill Shire provides of it's own boundaries, nor is it listed in the list of shire suburbs names and their origins.
 * The current list of Sydney suburbs should be fairly complete and definitive (errors and omissions can happen of course, but I'd venture to say it's now > 95% accurate), and myself and others have put a lot of effort into making it as accurate as we can, so if something is not on that list then it's most probably not a suburb.
 * For all of the above factual reasons, I encourage you to delete this entry. -- All the best, Nickj (t) 00:12, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Nickj. The Gregory's Street Directory does not list this as a suburb or locality. Capitalistroadster 00:25, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Kappa 03:08, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm changing my vote to Delete; Nickj has me convinced. --DavidConrad 05:19, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Change vote to delete as per Nickj CLW 05:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, name doesn't seem to be used by anywhere other than the confused lists of the Department of Local Government. JPD 08:09, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Nickj--nixie 11:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per Nickj. Ambi 11:37, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nickj. It is not listed by Australia Post, either. Nickj has done a good job sorting suburbs localities and local names. --Scott Davis Talk 12:59, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * It's not just me - others (especially JPD) have done a lot too. -- All the best, Nickj (t) 00:31, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.