Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cattle judging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. WP:GNG was established by 6 books listed about cattle judging. Some of those books should be incorporated as refs since the articles is under-sourced. (non-admin closure) ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎  12:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Cattle judging

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The "cattle judging" process may be notable, however, this article seems to be about "how to" judge cattle, which is against our policy WP:NOTHOWTO. Additionally, this article has been unsourced since 2007. Natg 19 (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Cattle; sources are also needed for that section, though. BD2412  T 03:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The process of judging cattle is highly notable as there are numerous books dedicated to the topic – see above. WP:NOTHOWTO is not a reason to delete because it is a stylistic issue: "an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manual, cookbook, advice column (legal, medical or otherwise) or suggestion box. This includes tutorials, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes."  The article is not especially in this style; it just naturally lists the points which cattle are usually judged on.  Insofar as the presentation might be improved on, this is done by ordinary editing, not deletion, per policy WP:ATD, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page."  See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per, cattle judging is the subject of numerous books.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, without prejudice to a later merger to something like Livestock judging, numerous sources cover the subject but a broader page may be preferable. Cavalryman (talk) 22:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.