Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cauliflower Alley Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Cauliflower Alley Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page fails the general notability guideline. Cauliflower Alley Club has not received significant enough coverage from reliable, secondary sources. An attempt to locate sources shows that the Club has not receive coverage wide enough for it to have an article. CR 4 ZE (t &bull; c) 08:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 6.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 08:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Received enough coverage to cover WP:GNG concerns. Sources from Canadian Online Explorer, LA Times, The Argus-Press, PWtorch exist.  It seems to have been covered in several books, including Babyface Goes to Hollywood - Fighters, Mobsters & Film Stars and The Jimmy McLarnin Story and Historical Dictionary of Wrestling by John Grasso.LM2000 (talk) 04:27, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Source examples:, ,
 * – NorthAmerica1000 03:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Actually, the search results given by the nominator establish notability, as they are reliable, secondary sources and give depth of coverage. In addition to the ones mentioned above, there is a notice on the Fight Network website (certainly a major, reliable, secondary source) about a CAC reunion. If the CAC weren't a major organization, the Fight Network certainly wouldn't be discussing their reunion dinner. Furthermore, just look at the picture of some of the members. These are major names in professional wrestling. Clearly, this is a notable organization. On top of that, the five books in the Further Reading section of the article help demonstrate extra notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.