Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause to Love You


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect is the most policy based option here. Nothing really to merge. However, the page histories of all three articles of the singles (all of which I'm redirecting in a minute here), will be intact per GFDL and if anyone wants to mine the contents to expand the album article. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  16:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Cause to Love You

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable single, fails WP:MUSIC ukexpat (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Catharsis (Fingertips album) article. Same goes for the other 2 singles off that album, "Move Faster" & "You're Gone". They don't even have references, at least "Cause to Love You" does, showing some sort of notability, even if one link points to the bands own website.    Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - not sure what there is to merge. The album article already lists them as tracks. – ukexpat (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom, clearly fails WP:MUSIC. Paste (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Aww, mindless rubbish really, like the order of the single releases, and the info on the fact this one made it to the charts, just to fill out the album article more I guess.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 11:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect &rarr; Catharsis (Fingertips album) and tag with Template:R to list entry. The R-template suggested includes the statement "for subjects not notable enough to have separate articles", which applies in this case.  The references associated with the article are problematic.  The Radio Comercial link leads to the homepage and I was unable to verify that the song is even mentioned on the site at all (a link should be provided to a specified page and not the homepage).  The other link is to the band that produced the song, thus not an independent source.  P.S. this could have either gone through WP:PROD or been subjected to bold action to redirect (the latter based on the weakness of the supporting references).  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 17:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.