Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavalla Hill FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — A itias  //  discussion  18:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Cavalla Hill FC

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Prod reason was: "Club on an island with some 4,000 inhabitants (now, used to be some 8,000), so dubious notability from the start. Capacity of all stadiums on the island is apparently 4,000 as well. So it seems that the info in this unsourced article is very dubious, and that the club is not notable anyway" After the prod was removed (article unchanged), I searched some more, and could not find any evidence that this even exists, never mind it being notable. All five Google hits are Wikipedia or mirrors, and there are no Google News hits. Cavalla Hill has no Wikipedia article but it seems to exist (although it is not shown here, it should be a part of or close to Saint-Peter), so there may well be a small local football club, but it clearly fails WP:ORG since it even fails WP:V. Fram (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's not much more to say that wasn't covered by the nominator. This is either a hoax or a spectacularly obscure team. In either case, there is nowhere near sufficient coverage to produce a verifiable encyclopedia article. ~ mazca  t 17:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no clubs in Montserrat are going to meet WP:FOOTY. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a whole category filled with similar articles. Each of the infoboxes states the capacity of the particular stadium to be 4000.  That is probably the result of a copy & paste. Drawn Some (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - A poorly written article that gives no sources to establish any kind of notability. John Sloan @ 12:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. --Angelo (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable club. GiantSnowman 22:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable football club. BigDunc  Talk 21:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.