Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavallino LLC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @501  · 11:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Cavallino LLC

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. Article is written like a cross between an advert and a bio for the founder. Only thing that's even close to notability is that the founder wrote a book, but as notability isn't inherited so therefore cannot be carried on to the company. SPA user whose first edit was to remove the CSD notice, followed by their 2nd edit to remove it again, so it seems there's some CoI there. Rather than getting into an edit war I've brought it to afd.  Web H amster  22:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be entirely spammish. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * POLITE REQUEST FOR HOLD UPON DELETE. Our first attempt to add our verifiable corporate information simply requires a more comprehensive understanding of Wiki source code updates in order to demonstrate content validity. No spam has been added, only three users (each authorized editors for the corporation) have worked in tandem.  Advice and/or polite guideance would be greatly apreciated from the community. -- TexasMikeRyan  (Rawr and stuff) 01:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC) — TexasMikeRyan (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Well, first, the best advice I can give in adding your own corporate information is simple: don't add it. See that link as to why - it will explain my !vote.  Let other people add it.  As for formatting, all the basics are at Introduction.  Tutorials, formatting, everything - it's found there.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 05:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. See WP:NOTADVERTISING. Fails WP:SOURCES. Looks like a definite case of WP:COI as well. ThePointblank (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. 174.146.255.7 (talk) 08:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article must have been updated, sounds objective and factual...not advertising. Plus, the board member is former president of the Fed in San Francisco.  Company has been relevant in business field.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CBthilla (talk • contribs) 01:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)  — CBthilla (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * No imputation, but merely a notice: please see Single-purpose account.  Phoe  talk  19:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject to establish notability. Brief mentions are not the same as coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.