Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cayucas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Cayucas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was: Doesn't seem to meet WP:BAND Eeekster (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 *  Delete  - Looks to be an up and coming band. No prejudice to recreation when they arrive.  I did find this New Band of the Day article on the Guardian, but that isn't sufficient to estblaish notability now. -- Whpq (talk) 16:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The Guardian source is excellent, as is NPR's All Songs Considered 86.42.83.240 (talk) 14:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Band is getting play on Alt Nation at this time Floatjon (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2013 (UTC) -- also, besides my WP:BAND #11 argument, I'll note that there's more coverage/Google hits for the previous name, Oregon Bike Trails. Factor that in when considering notability. Floatjon (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON. Boleyn (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, although the NPR source linked by IP editor 86.42.83.240 does appear to be a significant coverage non-primary reliable source I have not found, while searching for reliable sources other non-primary reliable sources. Therefore, as there only appears to be one significant coverage source, it is my humble opinion that it is presently too soon for this subject to pass WP:GNG. If another significant coverage source comes out, then I would reconsider.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Due to information provided by Darkwind, subject of this AfD appears to pass WP:BAND, criteria #11. I believe this is a very low threshold, and thus only changing my opinion to Weak Keep.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Original closing comment: The result was   delete. As  noted, no prejudice against recreation with appropriate sources to establish notability, once these are available. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Relisting debate per a discussion on my talk page with  who provided some additional notability evidence; the community should have a chance to comment on this. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment The additional sources provided were: and  in support of GNG under the band's prior name, and  and  in support of WP:BAND#11. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Hello. I'm the creator of this page. I just added some sources to articles from LA Weekly, Altsounds.com, and more. I'm sure this is obvious, but I don't think this page should be deleted. The band is signed to Secretly Canadian, the same guys who work with artists like Major Lazer, Bon Iver, Dinosaur Jr. and more. The music is distributed internationally and the band tours internationally. I'm a huge fan and, judging by the number of articles about Cayucas you can find on google, I think many others are as well. I didn't want to delete the Multiple Issues/Deletion Consideration boxes from the code because I'm not sure that that's my place, but I do want to make you all aware of these updates to the page so that hopefully you will delete those boxes. Thanks! 01:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - I've reviewed the additional sources and although this creeps up towards notability, I feel it still falls short at this time. I've amended to a weak delete recognizing there is a stronger case here for notability. -- Whpq (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Suggestion Considering that their debut album, Bigfoot, came out 2 days ago it might not be a bad idea to close this discussion down and reopen in a month or so if it doesn't generate any significant press. J04n(talk page) 10:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject satisfies WP:GNG with significant coverage from reliable and independent sources (PitchforkNPRBuzzinePretty Much MagazineContact Music). I can find several more if needed.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  17:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.