Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cdza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Cdza

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to be non-notable per lack of coverage beyond what's in this page and present sources being mostly unreliable, off-topic, and/or too brief to be significant. There's a section on Michael Thurber's page that covers the group which would be a good redirect target. QuietHere (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. QuietHere (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Fatal lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. In fact, there's only a single reliable source at all on the page - which makes it border on plagiarism and copyright violation - as well as a synthesis of less than reliable sources. In 2006, we would let this slide, but in 2023 we boil such garbage. I personally would not oppose a redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.