Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cec Cinder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - unsourced, spam, and notability is dubious. See the alexa rank for his organisation for one indication.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Cec Cinder

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't establish notability, written entirely in bullet statements, doesn't properly source, and written like a fan page. Neonblak 19:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * eghad !, how in world did I mess that up. Anyway the article is Cec Cinder. Neonblak 20:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed I fixed the AfD.   Pablo   Talk  |  Contributions  20:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR, WP:N. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Cec Cinder is a significant figure in the social nudity movement. His work with Beachfront USA alone is significant enough. Edit article but do not delete. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 23:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless properly refed There are no refs for this at all it's a load of assertions. And even then it'd be very marginal NBeale 18:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 14:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Krakatoa  Katie  12:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - no references and a lot of OR, looks like. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tony Fox. GreenJoe 20:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Personage is notable, even if the article is badly written.--Mike18xx 07:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Asserts notability, should be easy to source. Needs improvement, not deletion.-- killing sparrows  (chirp!) 16:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.