Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecelia Specht


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Cecelia Specht

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail GNG, Spartaz Humbug! 21:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as multiple searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) all found nothing and she's never seemed to have something more than a few episodes of a show. Not notable at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  21:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Bit actor, non-notable roles, lack of depth of coverage in reliable sources. Tarc (talk) 11:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 03:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete only source is IMdB, and that is not a reliable source. Non-notable. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 01:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in this article shows they're notable- the article just says they did some university degrees and is married to a notable person. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.