Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecil Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy close Nominated revision was nonsense/vandalism. Current revision is a stub on an athlete who, as a former NFL player, meets WP:ATHLETE without dispute. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Cecil Johnson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Article has no sources and contains mostly fictional and unverified information HBombL (talk) 01:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think that this page needs to be deleted if for the sole reason that most of these examples seem to be absolute gibberish and unverifiable. Unless a source can be proposed which contests this theory, then I propose this page be deleted. HBombL (talk) 01:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax, the sooner the better. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * G3 Contains way too much nonsense. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Keep as former NFL player, meets notability for athletes.  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not long enough to be an article. Bluescientist (talk) 01:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoa check out the history. Someone needs a vandalism warning--and the AfD can be withdrawn. This used to be a football player; I have restored him. Delete as a hoax, the sooner the better. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * &^%$@**&^^ I hate edit conflicts. Hammer, I left you a note on your talk--please withdraw the speedy request? Bluescientist, there is no required minimum length, as far as I know. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.