Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilie Bjergen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Cecilie Bjergen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Bjergen doesn't seem to meet WP:NBAD and so is required to meet WP:GNG. I found no evidence of significant coverage in a Danish source search despite playing in the internet era. I found some coverage in a local Nibe-based newspaper but Nibe Avis 1 and Nibe Avis 2 clearly both fail criterion 2 of WP:YOUNGATH, which states ''The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications. It especially excludes using game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews as sources to establish notability.'' Routine game summaries in a local paper are not enough. The only other non-database source that I found was Badminton Bladet, which is also entirely trivial coverage of Bjergen. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  21:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Badminton,  and Denmark.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * *Delete I agree with this recommendation and the points that have been made. This seems like a clear delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.