Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Springs, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Cedar Springs, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of a settlement; maps show a spring with a tank next to a few foundations. –dlthewave ☎ 19:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. –dlthewave ☎ 19:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Many, many matches on Google Scholar, Newspapers.com, and Google Books. While a lot of those results are trivial mentions, there's some significant coverage in there, with sources like Dine Bikeyah Navajo Places, The Navajo Country, and Geology of Navajo Country provide some significant coverage and establish that this has historically been a populated place. Hubbell Trading Post and A Great Aridness provide significant coverage of trading posts established at Cedar Springs and their history, as well as descriptions of the site more generally. A lot of the mere mentions (not linked) also use Cedar Springs to give geographic directions to other places, suggesting a level of recognition that implies further significant coverage's existence (although at this point I think even just the assembled sources above substantiate at least a weak case for GNG outright). FWIW, while the search term "Cedar Springs" "Arizona" turns up the largest pile of (mostly trivial) results, "Cedar Springs" "Navajo" returned most of the more substantial sources I've linked above. signed,Rosguill talk 19:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rosguill; the article passes both WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 19:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Quick search demonstrates plenty of WP:SIGCOV by reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability and satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Shawn Teller (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.