Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedarsoft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Cedarsoft

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

While getting bought out by AlienWare can be notable, I'm not sure a company who maxed out a $5 million of sales of year is notable enough. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete, can't find any coverage in reliable sources. -- Nuujinn (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I'm not sure that any of this is even verifiable. I couldn't find any mentions in reliable sources. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not because of the sales — notability has nothing to do with meeting some arbitrary income figure. It's entirely about the presence or absence of reliable sources, but those are clearly lacking here. If an article's been around for four years, and we still can't actually figure out what individual city the company was based in (as opposed to describing and categorizing it solely by province), then there clearly aren't enough valid sources about the company to make it a keepable article. Bearcat (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.