Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedarville University Water Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cedarville University. Because WP:ATD. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Cedarville University Water Tower

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NGEO, few independent sources Willsome429 (say hey or see what I’ve worked on!) 00:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete It's a university water tower with the school's logo and wordmark on it...like all universities with water towers. Talking about the paint used on the tower and that it has a police phone in the tower's parking lot seems like stretching the article absurdly to justify WP:N, but we have no Ypsilanti Water Tower by any stretch of the imagination here.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect – To Cedarville University. Would fit nicely in to that page. ShoesssS Talk 15:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing notable about this water tower.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:ROTM water tower. Acnetj (talk) 07:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the Uni per ATD-R. cinco deL3X1 ◊distænt write◊  11:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to the university. Note we are obligated to seek wp:ATD alternatives to deletion, and a good one is available here.This source (in the article) is reasonable coverage of the university's revision of its mascot branding and its usage of the image on the water tower, and that this was/is important to the university.  Justifies including the photo into the university article.  I say "Merge" rather than "Redirect" because this is substantial content, although small in amount. --Doncram (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.