Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Noel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to lack of participation. Aervanath (talk) 20:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Cedric Noel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject does not seem to have much coverage in reliable secondary sources. I notice that we also have Draft:Cedric Noel which was declined for lack of notability. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The previous article about Cedric Noel was, in fact, lacking in terms of notability criteria. I am not defending the initial attempt. I would think, in this case, that acknowledgement from Stereogum, Aquarium Drunkard, Exclaim! and others would be suitable when considered in combination with collaborations with other notable artists for Cedric Noel to be considered a notable contemporary artist.ThomasMikael (talk) 1:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
 * Logs:
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.