Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebfie (App)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Celebfie (App)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Mobile app does not meet WP:NCORP- coverage is WP:ROUTINE articles about the launch of the app. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I personally think this is advertising junk and wish I could !vote to delete.  But I think they slip through our notability guidelines with what appear to be the required multiple reliable independent secondary sources, especially the Forbes India article.  At AfD, that's all they need.  Msnicki (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I missed the disclaimer on the Forbes article. Kudos to  for their sharp eyes.  Msnicki (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. More citations have been added to support AFD. Please suggest the additional information required to avoid getting the page deleted. Priyagupte (talk) 12:35, 11 January 2021 (IST)

''Disclaimer: This content is distributed by Digpu News Network. No Forbes India journalist is involved in the creation of this content.''
 * DeleteThe Forbes India article doesn't count as reliable. It was not written by staff or journalist at Forbes India. The disclaimer at the bottom states this:

It is simply another advertisement. We have biographies on women being deleted with far better and more reliable sources than this commercial. Doesn't meet the requirements set out by WP:N and so doesn't pass our basic notability guideline. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 13:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Request you to consider the other citation links used. Can suggestions on which sites are considered significant will be very helpful. Priyagupte (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2021 (IST)  (duplicate !vote)
 * Delete as non-notable and with unreliable or trivial coverage. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Celebfie: Coverage goes beyond WP:ROUTINE. I found a few reliable sources about the app released at most 2 months ago:, , , and . That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm not convinced. Your sources 1 and 3 are from Big News Network, republishing material from aninews.in which appears to have gotten it from this NewsVoir press release. The rest self-identify as press releases and interviews.  None of this is helpful in establishing notability.  Msnicki (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of WP:SIGCOV from actual RS, fails GNG. SK2242 (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost exclusively has non-independent promotional coverage. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 08:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.