Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebracation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Celebracation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

neologism which is described as existing only on one website for the purpose of advertising. Beach drifter (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-described neologism which torpedoes its notability in the entry. Wperdue (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Does not meet our criteria for inclusion currently. Please don't send it over.—msh210@enwikt 00:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This looks more like something that should be on Urban Dictionary.  Article notes its own lack of notability - I can't even justify a transwiki to wiktionary. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is practically the definition of a protologism. We don't want it, and, as Dennisthe2 notes, Wiktionary wouldn't want it either. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Anyone can make up a word, and people in advertising are especially talented at this, but that doesn't make it worth an article in WP.Northwestgnome (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Del NN.&mdash;msh210 &#x2120; 00:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.