Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrate Mistakes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 06:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Celebrate Mistakes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Album that didn't not chart and has had zero references in the article since 2009. I'm seeing nothing notable here. Adamant1 (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence that it charted or otherwise meets WP:NALBUM. (Note: If Articles for deletion/Number One Gun is closed as 'keep', this article should be redirected there). Eddie891 Talk Work 14:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep AllMusic and Jesus Freak Hideout are valid sources for reviews. Striking vote based on sources found by . I must have completely messed up my search query, because I found no reviews. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Review at AllMusic and Jesus Freak Hideout. I'm stopping with two reviews as that passes WP:GNG for albums. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I was wondering if Adamant1 could describe the steps done in WP:BEFORE with this item. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure. I found both the reviews you cited, but determined that the allmusic review wasn't in-depth enough. Since it only describes one song from the album, out of 11, just to say in an extremely trivial way that it is "dripping with passion." Only mentioning a single song in passing isn't really an "album review." I'm fine with the JesusFreak review, because it actually discusses the album in an in-depth way, but we all know one review doesn't cut it. Like Eddie891 I was unable to find other reviews besides those ones when I did a search for them. Hopefully he/she will change their vote back to delete since there is only one legitimate in-depth review. Unless another, actually usable one can be found. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: I found a few reliable sources which talk about the album:, and , as well as a review which partially mentions the album. It's also mentioned in the Retal release section of CMJ New Music magazines. The said sources, including the ones indicated above, make the article good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. My vote stands.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 22:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The third one is a personal blog. So it doesn't count for notability. The other ones seem fine though. Thanks for contributing them. Hopefully they will lead to the article having more then just a track listing. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.