Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebriducks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (A7) by ChrisO. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've userified the text of the article per this request, so this deletion should not be taken to prejudice the recreation of the article if it is made properly encyclopedic. -- ChrisO (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Celebriducks

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced spam about a non-notable product MickMacNee (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of sources, no assertion of notability and uncontested COI. The creator of the article has mentioned having a conflict of interest ("I do know the owner of the company (darn nice guy, BTW)"); at worst they're an employee, at best they're promoting the company on behalf of its owner ("I explained to him that he could not post himself, due to perceived conflict of interest."). --McGeddon (talk) 10:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I know this page has been plagued with conflict of interest problems, but I can find multiple independent sources for 'celebriducks' - from a quick Google search, I've found links such as this link and this CNN report. However, the COI and the fact that this article appears to be simply spam really overrules this, so I'm going to go for a weak delete. JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * A7 Doesn't assert notability, and those sources look iffy. Have they done one of Duck Edwing? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 13:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.