Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrities Worldwide (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Celebrities Worldwide
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Orphaned article about a minimally notable media company. References do not demonstrate notability and some are not even relevant. DanielRigal (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —DanielRigal (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The first AfD lists delete as outcome and this should have happened then. Not notable. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  ((⊕)) 23:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually it was deleted over four years ago and was recreated this August. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Spam-tastic, mate! Have a look at the creator, Guy (Help!) 23:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just declined a speedy on this as it is no so horrible as to warrant being deleted without discussion. I considered deleting it as a recreation of previously deleted content, but this version uses sources that were not attached to the previous version. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional page on non-notaqble business created by paid editors.   Will Beback    talk    01:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. So blatantly spammy and promotional. Cindamuse (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.