Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CelebrityNetWorth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

CelebrityNetWorth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No opinion - unfinished nomination by an IP. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. Previously noted and it does not meet notability criteria. Appears to be self promotion. Accurate194534 (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: New account, obviously the IP which started this nomination, but could not create the AfD page anonymously. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Quartz is what tips it to keep for me. The Fox article NYDN articles are borderline trivial mentions, but combined with Quartz I think it scrapes by GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm afraid the Quartz article doesn't really do it for me, as it's more of a profile piece on the guy who runs it. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 01:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, Didn't see any blogs or so, its encyclopedic and mentioned by papers I recognize. 79.67.71.223 (talk) 08:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.