Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CelebrityNetWorth (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  13:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

CelebrityNetWorth
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a second nomination, I don't think there are enough sources to pass WP:NWEB - the Quartz article is an interview, so its not counted as an in-depth, independent source for notability Seraphim System  ( talk ) 21:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Seraphim System  ( talk ) 21:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quite a few publications reference this site, but there's not enough coverage regarding the site itself to write a substantial article. The closest thing I can find to a source covering the site is "How Google eats a business whole" from The Outline, but even that article is focused on Google rather than CelebrityNetWorth. Newslinger (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added information regarding Google's use of CelebrityNetWorth's data into the article, and sourced "How Google eats a business whole" from The Outline. The article should immediately be renamed to Celebrity Net Worth to reflect the site's current name. Newslinger (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Widely quoted and covered site. Has 36,000+ mentions in Google News search alone. Millions of references around the web. Highly noteworthy site. Eric (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep It's coverage in Outline's "How Google Ate CelebrityNetWorth.com" plus the Quartz interview provide enough reliably reported info about its operation to indicate that it is professionally run, cited by reliable sources and regularly engages in fact-checking its content. While its content may not be considered an "encyclopedic" focus by some, it covers an area of wide public interest and appears to make efforts to provide information that, if not accurate to the dollar, gives relative rankings of celebrities' income that does not appear fabricated or arbitrary. FactStraight (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:GNG and has RS.  Snowycats (talk) 04:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.