Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Messages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wickethewok 14:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Celebrity Messages
Non-notable company; fails WP:CORP. MichaelZimmer (talk) 15:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising space. Spartaz 15:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -Murcielago 17:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's unsophisticated humor, but it appeals to a lot of people. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Very weak keep - I remember hearing about this awhile ago, it did generate some news and it's a unique concept I think. I'll monitor to see if you post more informationmboverload @  08:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * As nicely as possible, I'd encourage "I've heard of this" to be a weak delete rational per the verification policy. More to the point, if I closed this debate I'd blip right over someone who opined keep in this manner, and most admins would do the same. -  brenneman  {L} 08:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Huh? --mboverload @ 19:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Explicit verfiability trumps vague recollection, I believe he's saying. --Calton | Talk 01:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also advertisement.  Unable to find any non-trivial third-party articles to meet WP:CORP.  A lot of Google hits for "celebrity messages" but these seem largely by competitors listing their own wares, and people giving shout-outs to their fans.  If mboverload can document alleged news coverage, I'd be willing to change my nomination.  Tychocat 10:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.