Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celene (Greyhawk) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 10:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Celene (Greyhawk)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure about individual nation within a particular campaign setting of D&D. I can't seem to find sources evidencing out of universe notability to Celene. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the prior deletion discussion from seven years ago largely admitted that any notability is inherited from the notability of the greater Greyhawk campaign setting but notability is not inherited down to the individual nations within that setting. The argument that it was notable based entirely on the existence of primary sources is against WP:FICTION to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep if sources can be found, otherwise merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 23:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 02:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * fails GNG delete (or merge if there is an appropriate target which isnt itself only supported by primary sources)-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  04:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 07:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.