Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celer Mortis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 00:00, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Celer Mortis
Apparently a personal D&D character, failed, CSD does not(?) quite apply as it's a fictional person. Delete -- stillnotelf   has a talk page  06:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Hey, suppose this is gamecruft? I believe the purpose of Wiki is a free encyclopedia. This is a referance to a very popular character in a fairly large DnD community. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.82.176.29 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 25 March 2006  (UTC)
 * Delete I think the name is supposed to be Latin for quick death but that should be "Celer Mors" or "Mors Celer." So its a non-notable fictional character with an incorrect name. JoshuaZ 07:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my PROD: "Weak search results. Gamecruft; likely fan fiction character." -- Kinu t /c  07:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The editor of the article has made an unsigned comment on the talk page of "Don't Delete it". JoshuaZ 07:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I've welcomed him on his talk page and requested that he make his comment to this page instead. -- stillnotelf   has a talk page  07:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (and substandard Latinity per JoshuZ) Bucketsofg 08:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Icarus 10:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Question I can understand why you would want to delete this page, as it may seem pointless. Yet there is no harm in having it up, it is just a character that our D&D community has built, and we would like to let other people take a look. It has a decent amount of writing, and there doesn't seem to be a major reason to delete it, although it does seem pointless to you. -Sniper28
 * Question Also, I wanted to know how to make the second part of celer's physical description to be not italicized, and if that can't be done I wanted to know how to make the entire thing italicized. The word document I copied and pasted wasn't italicized, and I can't find the italics code in the article either. Please help me. -Sniper28
 * Comment The main reason to delete it is that Wikipedia is not a free webhost. I've fixed the italics issue for you (assuming I understood what you wanted fixed).  You might want to see the links I left on your talk page which have editing help. --  stillnotelf   has a talk page  17:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem with the italics is that there were additional '' symbols (two apostrophes, as opposed to a single double-quote mark) which generate italics in Wikipedia. Delete due to lack of evidence that this character is known to a large community. --Metropolitan90 01:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn gamecruft/fancruft. MCB 23:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Question How can we prove it to you? signatures from different IP's? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sniper28 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Prove what? That it's a large community...? The size of the community is irrelevant, it's still an internal matter of the group, not encyclopedia material.  --  stillnotelf   is invisible  02:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Question Can any of you fix th format of the backstory? A box with a link to this deletion discussion covers up the bottom part of the story.


 * Keep it This is a popular character, My friends consistantly use this page as a referance for a character. This is not being used as free webhosting, just a referance, which is what encyclopedias are designed to do. In any case, I am in favor of this site being kept.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.