Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celeste Newbrough


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Celeste Newbrough

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not generally notable. Poorly Sourced. Various edit issues. Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Subject fails WP:AUTHOR & WP:ANYBIO. Multiple passing mentions of the subject, however none that would be considered significant coverage as required in WP:GNG. Although subject has authored a book, subject does not meet criteria set forth in AUTHOR or ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, per our standards. obviously known in her circle, and of some importance in eco/fem/gender circles, but the books are essentially self published. No prejudice against recreation if her work becomes better known.User:Mercurywoodrose99.35.50.219 (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.