Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Patrol (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Celestial Patrol
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previous AfD nomination was: Looks like a promotional article, so I considered speedying, but the foreign language sources gave me pause for thought. However, they seem only to be evidencing elements that don't build notability claims for this website. Previous AfD received no contributions so was closed as "no consensus". Some opinions please! Dweller (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability, this would need citations to peer-reviewed scientific literature to show this - if it's being ignored by other seismologists, it's unlikely to have much going for it. Mikenorton (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches found nothing better and the current article is still questionable for the software notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  23:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ditto above SwisterTwister. Riventree (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.