Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celine Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Celine Chen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't really see anything indicating notability. Probably self-created. Nothing on Google. However, it would be useful if someone who can read Chinese can check the references and see if she has notability in Chinese language sources. Nothing on Google, news archive hits only show a few articles written by Chen. There are assertions of notability so this deserves discussion. Mabalu (talk) 11:35, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search using Google Translate and both character versions of her name, but couldn't find anything to show notability for her. I saw what appears to be some articles written by her, but then I saw a lot of mention for another person by the same name that wasn't her. Unless someone could bring up articles to show notability for her (as opposed to just some of the stuff she's written), then this will have to be a delete from my end. I'm aware that GT has its limitations, so I am open to any new sources coming in.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mabalu (talk) 07:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.