Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cell Phone Signal Booster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:IAR. I have zero tolerance for this tactic. Will do the necessary moves. Neil N  talk to me 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Cell Phone Signal Booster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references seem to be a mostly/all fake. None of the 8 references are available online. In particular: In addition to questionable references: I'm sorely tempted to just delete this as dishonestly created spam, but the article has been here since 2015 (!) so I guess another week can't hurt. Note to closing admin: if this is a "delete", we should probably remove content, delete Mayawaits' contribs, and move it back to Witt equivalence; there's some history there to preserve that was lost in the page move. And probably a futile block of long-abandoned User:Mayawaits for spamming. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Reference 3 is just a link to a journalism school.
 * The Saturday Paper is used as reference 5, but the reference says it was the 5 January 2014 edition; the paper began publishing on March 2014 (see our article, and the reference used that confirms the March 2014 launch ).
 * Tele-Tech & Electronic Industries Journal is used as reference, but it appears this hasn't been published since 1956.
 * The New York Times article in reference 7 doesn't appear to exist (I'm assuming the title in the reference is a typo, but there are no similarly titled articles); Google shows many, many NYT articles on this subject, but nothing with this date or this author
 * It appears that no such book as reference 8 exists; claims to be published by Houghton Mifflin, but doesn't show up in their web site . Plus, does that really look like a legit book title to you?
 * The article was created by an SPA who moved an existing page and overwrote the content, rather than create a new page; this is a tactic done to avoid new page patrollers.
 * Promotional in tone.
 * Nuke and pave into a redirect to cellular repeater. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.