Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellador


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. Agent 86 00:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Cellador

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article on a band has been speedily deleted seven times, mostly under WP:CSD. More information was brought to light at deletion review that may be enough to merit inclusion. Note that there are two "l"s in the name; there is a TV production company with only one "l" that is totally unrelated. Please read the article and the nomination at deletion review before opining. This is a procedural nomination; I have no opinion. GRBerry 16:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * KEEP IT Funny... it seems like somebody really wants this out of here.......Omaha residents I assume..... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Talkingtable (talk • contribs) 08:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Keep If there isn't any sufficent material for this page, then why don't you go ahead and delete some of the other band pages that has had either nothing done to them or shorter than this. I agree with the below poster with what they're doing. KEEP. -- Faded 12:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The band is on a major label, Metal Blade. They have been on a national tour with other notable acts as stated on the website for MTV. They have a lengthy write up on All Music Guide and it can be seen on the VH1 website. Just doing a search on them at Blabbermouth.net brings up over 2 pages of news reports that mention them. --E tac 23:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is not sufficient source material to include an attributed, encyclopedic article about Cellador (all I found were notices of the bands appearances). Please note that Cellador is not Celador, which might be come up in a Google search. -- Jreferee 05:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Whatever, Cellador easily passes several of the listed critera on WP:BAND (which by the way also makes it clear that this article should never have been speedy deleted in the first place contrary to what several users said on the deletion review page). If you have a problem with the current article it merely needs to be listed as a stub and given an unreferenced tag, as the article obviously is genuine and features a notable subject. So rather than quoting policy pages on which I can't find anything that specifically relates to this article, prove that Cellador in no way passes WP:BAND which is the established guidline for musical artists. Also I googled "Cellador" and got 121,000 results, so I take it you have went through all of those and determined that there is not sufficient information?--E tac 07:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Like E tac said if there are things that need to be worked out then the can. But as it is I don't see why it should be taken away. Truemetalfan 18, 2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.83.180 (talk • contribs)


 * Keep For the resons stated so eloquently by E tac. The quality of the artcile already in place should have no role in determining the subject's notability. Radagast1983 22:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * keep per e-tac  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 16:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.