Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celler Scene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Celler Scene

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod; non-notable local magazine; has no 3rd party references that discuss the subject, nor can good faith searches find any. Fails WP:N. (Note: the article on the same subject on German Wikipedia has been deleted: article, discussion; from the dodgy Google translation it seems to fails their notability guidelines for magazines.) Tassedethe (talk) 11:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Actually there are a number of independent 3rd party German sources that refer to this magazine, so please could you explain which notability criterion this fails. German Wikipedia's decision was only based on one vote and may not be very relevant. Finally note WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a reliable notability gauge. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Then could you please add some? I haven't been able to find any, just blogs and the publication's own pages; my reason for not advocating deletion has been that there may well be press mentions I can't see, being located outside Germany. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete unless someone can come up for sources that support notability. There's nothing here so far. Qworty (talk) 19:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.