Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellini (play)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Core desat 05:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Cellini (play)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason: non-notable, non-informative, no citations or references to this alleged play, no evidence of any publication, performance or review. Hence Delete - all it needs (if anything) is a mention in the WP article on its author. Smerus (talk) 22:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. See here, here, and here. Kakofonous (talk) 22:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability demonstrated by Kakofonous's sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It is no good you guys commenting on sources; the article lives or dies by what it contains - and there is no ref to these sources or any others in the article. If you like the article, edit it to include these sources - if you can't be bothered then you are tacitly agreeing that it is non-notable.--Smerus (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I edited the article to include those sources very soon after I found them, see this diff. Kakofonous (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.