Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtic legends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Celtic mythology. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Celtic legends

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no sources, might not be notable Chris! ct 02:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Celtic mythology, which would serve as an entry point to the subject. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 02:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Though the article itself is unsourced, the linked articles are well-sourced. Per WP:LISTS, this list serves a valid purpose outside of the auspices of Celtic mythology. Djma12 (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually I do see a couple of valid lists that could be created, after using categories to navigate which can prove awkward, but Celtic legends would probably too broad a range to work from. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 00:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. The   Wikipedist  03:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Might not be notable?! Way to give a convincing rationale for deletion. At any rate, just convert it into a category. i said 03:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per User:Flowerpotman. I think the template in Celtic mythology handles the job better than this article.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Flowerpotman.--SarekOfVulcan 05:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Guliolopez 12:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect and WP:SNOWBALL this. Totnesmartin 17:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.