Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celticminded


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Celticminded
WP:WEB. 'Nuff said. ➨  ЯEDVERS  10:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep No case made by nominator. Tremendously popular website in the UK, the busiest of its kind I believe. --No Username 11:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: No Username (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Comment Yes, I know. Personally, I would have thought it would have been evident from my username. Some people may say the same of you. --No Username 02:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I get the feeling the nominator is of Ibrox orientation TgC19 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TgC19 (talk • contribs) . User's 4th and 5th edits are to this AfD
 * Delete 796 google hits, 74 unique ST47 11:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Evidence needs to be given for popularity claims. JPD (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to follow WP:WEB, WP:RS, WP:CITE guidelines, Fails WP:V, and sections of WP:OR. -- Brian  ( How am I doing? ) 15:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Which particular parts of those guidelines did you have in mind?
 * Delete Unless there is some verification of its notability. Sparsefarce 18:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment That's why the {fact} tag is there. --No Username 02:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --M @ r ē ino 22:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Oldelpaso 08:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website, fails all three criteria listed in WP:WEB. Alexa.com ranking only 65,613 . Should probably have been speedied under WP:CSD #A7. Qwghlm 10:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam and and not notable outside of fans of one UK club. --Xrblsnggt 18:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.