Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centeenials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Centeenials

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Basically, the whole article is complete and utter OR and some of it is complete and utter nonsense or stuff which is certainly not relevant to the encylopaedia. For example, "The ongoing debate about which band members are gay still rages on, with current speculation". Notice the word speculation, as that is exactly what it is, and it may constitute WP:LIBEL towards some of the members mentioned as being 'likely to be homosexual'. It also fails WP:MUSIC by a long shot, and a long number of other things including but not limited to WP:RS, and WP:V. I emplore you to vote "Strong delete" so we can get rid of this once and for all.   Asenine   07:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Clearly fails WP:MUSIC, both CD's were self released and no reliable sources of information appear to exist to meet any of the other criteria. Looks like all of the possible WP:LIBEL content was removed shortly after the AfD. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Google search on a unique band name turns up only 89 hits. Pathetic. Clearly non-notable. --Bardin (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.