Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial F.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Centennial F.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Did prod, was removed with 'as a pioneering gteam,. perhaps it is notable -- would need a discussion.' Has been tagged for notability for several years, so perhaps it can be established one way or another in this discussion. Boleyn (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment What would document notability?--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - played in the national cup, a traditional benchmark at WP:FOOTY for club notability. GiantSnowman 18:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep – evidence has been provided to demonstrate notability. C679 12:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - per GS. Fenix down (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.