Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for American Homeless Veterans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Center for American Homeless Veterans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My extensive PROD removed with the sole basis of the IP apparently misunderstanding it, yet the added links now are simply trivial.and unconvincing, certainly not amounting to actual substance and there's nothing else suggesting otherwise better.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete A search in Google News produces exactly one story in which this organisation is referred to, and it appears to essentially be a press release reproduced in a small-town newspaper's website. A more general search produces a small number of extra sources which claim that this is a poor performing (at best) charity. Eg: . As such, WP:ORG isn't met, and this article may have been created to advertise this group. Nick-D (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as "org spam"; reads like a promotional brochure / donor prospectus. Off with it. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No hits from RS in GNews/Books. The only RS is the Tamba Bay Times piece, which reveals how this charity is highly inefficient at actually helping those they claim to help. Given that finding by a RS, the current article is definitely just promotional whitewashing, and saving it is impossible given the lack of other RS. Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: the only sources I'm finding are about how the organization is terrible at its finances. Not enough coverage to build an article on. Safehaven86 (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.