Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A small size research unit within a medium level research university.Only  one of its faculty has an article  in Wikipedia. Researchers can become notable because of the citations to the papers they publish without anything else being shown, under the special rule WP:PROF, but this does not extend to departments and laboratories. In practice, since only the famous ones get writtten about, the effective standard of notability for such organizations has generally been famous. This is nowhere near. There's no need for a merge or redirect--it is already  included in the article for the notable person whop runs it.  DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's no outstandingly better improvement to think it otherwise asal a non-notable unit as mentioned. SwisterTwister   talk  06:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete For an academic institution to be notable, it has to pass GNG or WP:NORG in general. This one fails that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.