Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Management Studies, Jain University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Jain University. As people have pointed out, there is nothing in the article to merge so a delete is appropriate; however, the title is a possible search term, so the contents will be deleted, and the title redirected to Jain University  SilkTork  *YES! 10:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Center for Management Studies, Jain University

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

One school of Jain University, no assertion of separate notability and content largely un-encyclopaedic leaflet style information and semi-advertisement. SGGH ping! 13:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional and no sign of notability. Polarpanda (talk) 14:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  15:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  15:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Jain University rather than deleting it. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 17:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, highly selectively, to Jain University. The nominator has failed to address the merge possibility as required by WP:BEFORE. TerriersFan (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I personally didn't see any possibility for a merge. The content of this article is not encyclopaedia, its information-brochure. This is the second time I've had to remind people not to assume the nominator hasn't done these checks. WP:AGF! SGGH ping! 09:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I haven't assumed that you did not carry out the checks but stated that you haven't addressed them in your nomination. There is nothing in the nomination that argues the case against a merge. A better way is simply to address the question in the form "I considered a merge into the parent article but rejected it because ...". That also has the advantage of moving the debate forward, and may well convince others to your viewpoint. I would add that the parent article is a mess. The way forward that I would prefer is to remove the list of courses and replace them with short summaries of the schools. TerriersFan (talk) 17:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge any useful content and delete the rest. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic entry. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 03:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I have added a sentence to Jain University mentioning the Center for Management Studies. The sentenece is not taken from the CMS article, the article does not contain any other useful content to be merged, and is not a useful search topic - so simple deletion is both possible and recommended. Abecedare (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The entire article is a brochure/spam. There is nothing to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I challenge the above "merge" commentators to find more than a few words in this advertisement that might be useful for a merger.  Sandstein   06:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Trying to cleanup promotional content. I think it passes GNG as it is a department of a university recognized by the University Grants Commission of India. Geeteshgadkari (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.